Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 46 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Giselle Wittgenstein  
View profile
(5 users)  More options Sep 7, 2:16 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: Giselle Wittgenstein <wittgenste...@americanconservative.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:16:13 -0700
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 2:16 am
Subject: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
Pros:
- Dead Saddam
- No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on the run
- Democratized Iraq
- Clinton Credit Crisis contained
- Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American families

Cons:
- Slightly higher gas prices
- ...?

Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

GWB is the man.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Republican Liar  
View profile
(2 users)  More options Sep 7, 2:49 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 04:49:34 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 2:49 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency

"Giselle Wittgenstein"

<wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote in message

news:ga02kv$u90$1@registered.motzarella.org

> Pros:
> - Dead Saddam

  How has that helped to serve America? How many lives did it cost?

> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on
> the run

What does that have to do with anything? There hasn't been another Katrina.
Does Bush get credit for that too?

> - Democratized Iraq

There is no democracy in Iraq.

> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained

 What crisis is that? The Bush crisis is the real concern of Americans.

> - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American
> families

 What lower taxes and for whom? Does that offset the rise of inflation and
the lower USD?

> Cons:
> - Slightly higher gas prices
> - ...?

> Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

> GWB is the man.

 Why is the rest of your party running from him? Why is McCain trying so
hard to convince America he is nothing like him?

 You are the one smoking crack or have your head up yours, fool. Crawl back
under your rock loser.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Obamas Energy Plan - Fill Your Tires  
View profile
(1 user)  More options Sep 7, 3:11 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: Obamas Energy Plan - Fill Your Tires <greenmoney2...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 3:11 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
On Sep 7, 4:49 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:

> "Giselle Wittgenstein"<wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote in message

> news:ga02kv$u90$1@registered.motzarella.org

> > Pros:
> > - Dead Saddam

>   How has that helped to serve America? How many lives did it cost?

They volunteered, it was totally worth killing Hussein.  If you don't
think it helped the world, get your ass to Iran and protect
Mackmooood, if you can BWAHAHAHAHAHA

> > - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on
> > the run

> What does that have to do with anything? There hasn't been another Katrina.
> Does Bush get credit for that too?

Changing the subject makes you look afraid of the issue at hand.

> > - Democratized Iraq

> There is no democracy in Iraq.

People voting for the first time in their lives... remember the ink on
the fingers thing, moron?

> > - Clinton Credit Crisis contained

>  What crisis is that? The Bush crisis is the real concern of Americans.

> > - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American
> > families

>  What lower taxes and for whom? Does that offset the rise of inflation and
> the lower USD?

Democrats in Congress are 100% to blame for inflation by deliberately
screwing up the economy to make it an issue for the election.  Jeez,
you don't know how things work, do you?

> > Cons:
> > - Slightly higher gas prices
> > - ...?

Thanks to the worst Congress in US history, this Con isn't Bush's.

> > Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

> > GWB is the man.

AMEN and HALLELUJAH!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Poor Lil Johnny  
View profile
(1 user)  More options Sep 7, 4:25 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: "Poor Lil Johnny" <t...@alas.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 03:25:44 -0700
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 4:25 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency

"Obamas Energy Plan - Fill Your Tires" <greenmoney2...@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:f56c40b6-73ef-4958-a52c-


Democrats in Congress are 100% to blame for inflation by deliberately
screwing up the economy to make it an issue for the election.  Jeez,
you don't know how things work, do you?
***********************

Koo Koo
Koo Koo


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The tragedy of balding men with long hair  
View profile
 More options Sep 7, 4:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: The tragedy of balding men with long hair <goofin...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 03:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 4:36 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
On Sep 7, 1:16 am, Giselle Wittgenstein

<wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote:
> Pros:
> - Dead Saddam
> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on the run
> - Democratized Iraq
> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained
> - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American families

> Cons:
> - Slightly higher gas prices
> - ...?

> Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

> GWB is the man.

Dead Saddam?  You mean the dictator that America helped put in power
in Iraq and keep in power?  The man we armed?  So what, now we're
replacing him with a puppet democracy that has to give us what we want
or we won't leave?   Thousands die for a sham democracy and the death
of a man who we helped enthrone.  Great job, Bush.  Thanks for
ignoring the terrorists who attacked us and instead invade a country
that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks.  Genius.

No terror on America's soil.  Since few of the safeguards recommended
by the 9/11 Commission haven't been enacted by Bush and since the war
on terror is only creating more terrorists--as estimated by the CIA
and other intelligence agencies--it won't be long before terrorists
attack the United States again.

Democratized Iraq.  Nonsense.  They have no sovereignty.  They are an
occupied nation who must abide by the United States mandates.  How is
that a democracy?  When America leaves, then let's talk about Iraq
being a democracy.

Clinton's yadda yadda yadda.  Did you forget to mention Clinton's
federal surplus spent and now we have the largest federal deficit
ever?

Lower taxes...for the very rich.  And this during a time of war.
These tax breaks for the rich have succeeded in only one thing:
increase the gulf between the rich and everyone else and also eroded
what little remains of the middle class.  Last time there was this
level of wealth disparity was immediately prior to the Great
Depression.  There is a connection between wealth inequity and
economic downturns.

I notice that you didn't mention Enron in the con grouping.  Enron had
close ties with the Bush administration.  You didn't mention the
housing bubble popping nor the mortgage scandal nor the failure of
several banks and Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac.  All of these failures
were set in motion over twenty years ago when the knuckleheaded
Republicans thought it would be keen to deregulate everything.  When
the economists started predicting these events, instead of admitting
that deregulation doesn't work, the Republicans and Bush specifically
ignored the approaching storm.

Also, in the con grouping: The politicizing of many of the agencies
under the Bush administration, which is illegal.
The firing of US Attorneys for failure to illegally ignore Republican
crimes and to manufacture false charges against Democrats.

I could go on but we've all seen all of the negatives that Bush has
brought upon America.  What is astounding is that there are people who
still support Bush.  When you come on here and make false arguments to
defend Bush, you're wasting your time because most of us Liberals and
Democrats know our stuff.  If you want to defend Bush, try it with
your family, friends and coworkers because most Americans are ignorant
as to what really happened in the White House.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
evul  
View profile
(2 users)  More options Sep 7, 6:24 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
Followup-To: alt.drugs.pot
From: evul <e...@NOSPAMexilenet.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 14:24:58 +0200 (CEST)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 6:24 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
On 2008-09-07, Republican Liar <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:

> "Giselle Wittgenstein"
><wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote in message
> news:ga02kv$u90$1@registered.motzarella.org
>> Pros:
>> - Dead Saddam

>   How has that helped to serve America? How many lives did it cost?

It removed a brutal dictator who demonstrated his willingness to use
WMD. Clinton's appointed CIA director Tennant said he had the WMD,
Clinton said he had it. Other coutries intel said he had it. He thumbed
his nose at us after being warned about letting inspectors in which
would have avoided the conflict to begin with. Lives would not have
been so many if the democrats didn't stand in the way of everything.

>> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on
>> the run

> What does that have to do with anything? There hasn't been another Katrina.
> Does Bush get credit for that too?

As if Bush was responsible for katrina to begin with. He set a precident by
declaring it a disaster zone before the storm hit freeing up everyone to be
able to handle it but DEMOCRATS bothced it up and then had the audacity to
blame Bush.

>> - Democratized Iraq

> There is no democracy in Iraq.

Yes there is.

>> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained

>  What crisis is that? The Bush crisis is the real concern of Americans.

Hit your head lately?

No one said Bush didn't make mistakes.

>  You are the one smoking crack or have your head up yours, fool. Crawl back
> under your rock loser.

And I thought my grammar was bad.. :8


--

evul

+----------+-----------------------------------------------------+
|   The    | IRC: irc://irc.exilenet.org 6667 (port 7000 for SSL)|
| ExileNET | Web: http://www.exilenet.org/                       |
|   IRC    | Email: e...@NOSPAMexilenet.org                      |
| Network! | ICQ: 31337931                                       |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------+


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard Ashcroft  
View profile
 More options Sep 7, 6:38 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: Richard Ashcroft <richard.b.ashcr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 6:38 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency

evul wrote:
> On 2008-09-07, Republican Liar <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:

> > "Giselle Wittgenstein"
> ><wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote in message
> > news:ga02kv$u90$1@registered.motzarella.org
> >> Pros:
> >> - Dead Saddam

> >   How has that helped to serve America? How many lives did it cost?

> It removed a brutal dictator who demonstrated his willingness to use
> WMD.

"WMD" being a propaganda catchall term. The United States of America
are the only brutal dictators to ever deploy nuclear weapons against
other human beings.

> Clinton's appointed CIA director Tennant said he had the WMD,
> Clinton said he had it. Other coutries intel said he had it.

Anyone who did not go along with the PNAC plan to invade Iraq
(outlined in the Y2K document "Rebuilding America's Defenses") was
dismissed, so that is no surprise nor is it any excuse for acting on
false information.

The Bush administration are ratfucking liars, not simple victims of
bad intel.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Benjamin Pavsner  
View profile
 More options Sep 7, 6:58 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: "Benjamin Pavsner" <pavsn...@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:58:53 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 6:58 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency

"Giselle Wittgenstein" <wittgenste...@americanconservative.org> wrote in
message news:ga02kv$u90$1@registered.motzarella.org...

> Pros:
> - Dead Saddam
> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on the run

How much is it what Bush has done and how much is is dumb luck? 1.It was 8
1/2 years between the two World Trade Center attacks. 2. What do I hear
every time they test how well the TSA is doing? The seemingly not doing
their job well.

> - Democratized Iraq

Great. They can vote. Now all we have to do is feed the Iraqis, give them a
decent infrastructer and make sure they don't get blown up on the way to the
polling place.
> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained
In a word: Huh?
> - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American families

> Cons:
> - Slightly higher gas prices

Slightly would be $2 a gallon instead of $1.75 a gallon. I'm paying $3.50 a
gallon. Time to redefine terms.
> - ...?

All our gains we made in the 80s and 90s internationally are down the
toilet. Russia has gone from potentially having a democracy to being up to
it's old tricks. We have a secretary of state that can do little more than
give a good photo op. Iran is years away from making the Middle East a
nuclear wasteland. It seems our answer to most international crisises over
the past 7 1/2 years is a good stump speach and a slap on the wrist, tops.

> Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

OK, one can argue WORST president ever. There ARE Some presidents in the mid
to late 19th century that could vie for number one. Carter wasn't to keen,
either. Bush is easily on the Worst 5 list, and I don't mean squeaking in at
5, either. More like top 3.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Republican Liar  
View profile
 More options Sep 7, 7:18 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 09:18:09 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 7:18 am
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency

"Obamas Energy Plan - Fill Your Tires"

<greenmoney2...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:f56c40b6-73ef-4958-a52c-9cc7b4c36e8b@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com

 Hey moron, they thought it was payback for 911.  You sure are a fool aren't
you?

> > > - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on
> > > the run

> > What does that have to do with anything? There hasn't
> > been another Katrina. Does Bush get credit for that too?

> Changing the subject makes you look afraid of the issue
> at hand.

 Every failure of Bush is right on topic my clueless wonder.

> > > - Democratized Iraq

> > There is no democracy in Iraq.

> People voting for the first time in their lives...
> remember the ink on
> the fingers thing, moron?

 A mock election means nothing. "remember the ink"
Wahahahahaha................

 You are clearly a low IQ troll. Deal with it, America and what is left of
your party is.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Lansdell  
View profile
 More options Sep 7, 7:56 am
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.pot, rec.sport.football.college, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: Chris Lansdell <lansdellici...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:26:00 -0230
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of the George W. Bush presidency
Giselle Wittgenstein wrote:
> Pros:
> - Dead Saddam
> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on the run
> - Democratized Iraq
> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained
> - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American families

> Cons:
> - Slightly higher gas prices
> - ...?

Thousands of US soldiers dead in Iraq?
Worst economic period in decades?
Enough verbal faux pas that people are questioning his intelligence?
The laughing stock of the rest of the world? (Bush, not the US)

> Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.

> GWB is the man.

He is A man, yes. THE man, no. That would be THE Brian Kendrick.

--
--
Lansdellicious - out. SURIMATE!
http://www.411mania.com/user_profile.php?user_id=2212
www.altraps.com