Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
anderson's take on college football weekend #2
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 29 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
mianderson  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 8:22 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mianderson <clay...@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 8:22 am
Subject: anderson's take on college football weekend #2

Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend.  There were no marquee games, no
particularly exciting games save for a couple involving bottom dwellar
type teams(washington and mississippi), no real statement games by any
team.

Obviously, if the buckeyes want to take down usc next week they have
got to have better qb play than they got today.  I don't think they
can do it.  Im calling that game right now actually.

Georgia looks very good.  So does Oklahoma.  Of course they're playing
subpar competition to this point, but both offenses for those teams
just have a ton of playmakers.  Here is how I rank the sec teams at
this point:

Georgia
Florida

LSU

Auburn
Alabama

Georgia is the only team of the bunch where there are no questions.
They are good on both sides of the ball whereas Im still wondering
about florida's ability to run the ball against decent defenses when
harvin doesnt have the ball in his hands.  And georgias qb is probably
a little better as well.  LSU is below both Georgia and florida
because they have no qb.  And auburn and bama are behind all three
because their offenses are far too raw/unskilled to be in the georgia/
florida class.

Interesting note- of the top 15 teams right now, 10 are from the sec
and big12.

I also want to talk a little bit about byu.  The same crap happened
last year with hawaii in that a supposed "bcs sleeper" from one of
these nothing conferences hangs on to win a nailbiter against a horrid
team from a big4 conference(same team both times actually) and it's
not seen as a negative.  I just have no interest in seeing a team like
utah or byu or ecu in a bcs game.

As for the bcs bowl games, it's becoming very clear that one of those
matchups should be between the bigleast and acc "champs".  Also, I
will no longer use the term "bcs conference" to refer to the 6
conferences in the bcs.  Instead, the terms will be "big4" conference
to denote the sec, big12, pac10, and bigten.  For all other
conferences to include the acc, mountain west, bigleast, conference
usa, etc those will just be referred to as "non-big4 conference".

A little bit on ND-  not bad, not bad at all.  That schedule is so bad
it's feasible they could win 8 games and get to the gator bowl or
something.

My rankings after week2:

1) USC
2) Georgia
3) Oklahoma
4) Florida
5) Ohio State
6) Texas
7) LSU
8) Missouri

and thats all I feel like ranking this week.  Teams like auburn and
bama and texastech need to show me a little more before I include
them.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mianderson  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 8:40 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mianderson <clay...@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 8:40 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 10:22 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend.

and fortunately, next weekend is *much* better.  These are some of the
watchable games on tap for next saturday:

michigan-ND: the winner takes a big step towards getting the season
going in the right direction.

georgia-south carolina: only interesting because it's in columbia and
I want to see what georgia can do against a relatively decent defense.

wisconsin-fresno state: far far too many teams like fresno state with
numbers before their name.  Byu, fresno, utah, ecu this week.
Wisconsin needs to go out west and beat them down so we can take at
least one off the list.

auburn-mississippi state- im interested to see if auburn can make a
statement by blowing a fairly bad team in MSU out and proving that
they belong in the georgia/florida/lsu group....my guess is they dont.

ucla-byu: see wisconsin/fresno comments.  I'll be rooting for
neuheisal in this one.

Oregon-Purdue: weird matchup I guess, but oddly watchable in between
other games.

Ohio State-USC: USC 38  Ohio State 20.

There is also a friday night game between kansas and south florida I
find hilarious for many reasons.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
lein  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 8:44 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 8:44 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 7:22 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend.  There were no marquee games, no
> particularly exciting games save for a couple involving bottom dwellar
> type teams(washington and mississippi), no real statement games by any
> team.

Yeah, you really sucked Saturday night.   You had a chance with the
spotlight but you didn't take advantage of it and in the end, Florida
smacked you pretty hard.   I'll bet you don't want to see the gator
chomp anytime soon.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mianderson  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 8:50 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mianderson <clay...@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 8:50 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 10:44 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> On Sep 7, 7:22 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> > Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend.  There were no marquee games, no
> > particularly exciting games save for a couple involving bottom dwellar
> > type teams(washington and mississippi), no real statement games by any
> > team.

> Yeah, you really sucked Saturday night.   You had a chance with the
> spotlight but you didn't take advantage of it and in the end, Florida
> smacked you pretty hard.   I'll bet you don't want to see the gator
> chomp anytime soon.

Try to keep up- Im no longer a miami fan.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
tom_sawyer70@yahoo.com  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:11 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: "tom_sawye...@yahoo.com" <tom_sawye...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:11 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 10:44 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Yeah, you really sucked Saturday night.

He probably did, but not related to the Hurricanes.  If you haven't
noticed, they're not ranked in the top 3, so they're not one of "his"
teams at the mo'.  Please refer to the polls to "keep up."

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
C The Shocker  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:20 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: "C The Shocker" <pdxch...@verizon.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:20:42 GMT
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:20 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
"mianderson" <clay...@excite.com> wrote in message

news:1b823191-b1d8-4d13-8bef-8acbe6337228@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 7, 10:44 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> On Sep 7, 7:22 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> > Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend. There were no marquee games, no
> > particularly exciting games save for a couple involving bottom dwellar
> > type teams(washington and mississippi), no real statement games by any
> > team.

> Yeah, you really sucked Saturday night. You had a chance with the
> spotlight but you didn't take advantage of it and in the end, Florida
> smacked you pretty hard. I'll bet you don't want to see the gator
> chomp anytime soon.

Try to keep up- Im no longer a miami fan.

~~~~

LOL "no longer". This says everything about you.

--
C The Shocker
On Usenet, you're nothing, and I'm a GIANT.
You're like the white girl, and I'm Kobe BRYANT.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
lein  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:25 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:25 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 7:50 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> On Sep 7, 10:44 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> > On Sep 7, 7:22 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> > > Overall, a pretty uneventful weekend.  There were no marquee games, no
> > > particularly exciting games save for a couple involving bottom dwellar
> > > type teams(washington and mississippi), no real statement games by any
> > > team.

> > Yeah, you really sucked Saturday night.   You had a chance with the
> > spotlight but you didn't take advantage of it and in the end, Florida
> > smacked you pretty hard.   I'll bet you don't want to see the gator
> > chomp anytime soon.

> Try to keep up- Im no longer a miami fan.

Oh?  What changed?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pauli G  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:27 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: Pauli G <rior...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:27 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 10:40 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

hey, why not give us picks on these great games???

Do it right here.

Why would you find the Friday night game hillarious?  It sounds like a
good game for us college football fans to watch on an otherwise quiet
night, no?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pauli G  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:31 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: Pauli G <rior...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:31 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 11:25 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

I think he decided to become a huge #1 fan of every team in the SEC
except the bottom-feeding ones, thereby dropping all other
affiliations for this particular season at least.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mianderson  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:44 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mianderson <mianderso...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:44 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 11:25 am, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:

the whole team has a different attitude now(and has for awhile) of the
teams I appreciated.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mianderson  
View profile
 More options Sep 7 2008, 9:45 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mianderson <mianderso...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 9:45 am
Subject: Re: anderson's take on college football weekend #2
On Sep 7, 11:27 am, Pauli G <rior...@hotmail.com> wrote:

spreads arent up yet(at least not up yet at the sites I play)

> Why would you find the Friday night game hillarious?  It sounds like a
> good game for us college football fans to watch on an otherwise quiet
> night, no?

because friday night is a night for high school football.  And for me
friday night is not an "otherwise quiet" night....Im sure I'll be
doing something interesting.

- Hide quoted text -


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the