Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: "Chuck D." <chuc...@buckeye-access.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 7 2008 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: Big Ten Network: My Review
On Sep 7, 9:56 am, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 9:03 am, "J.C. Watts Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> wrote: Well, obviously ABC's 3:30 ET slot gets first dibs and then the ESPN > > Announcers: Decent > > Graphics: Fine > > Studio Hosts: OK > > Camera Work: Middle School Musical-esque. I swear everythime a team > the biggest problem with the bigten network at this point is that the > > Jon- Hide quoted text - > - Show quoted text - networks get a game or two if they want them. So the Big Ten Network does carry the leftover games with less meaning (i.e. that ABC/ESPN doesn't want). When conference play starts, the Big Ten will carry the Minnesota-Indiana type matchups. But as much as the games that BTN carries seem to be dogs, among the The network is able to carry more meaningful basketball games than You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||