Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Gyroscopic Inductance
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nemo  
View profile
 More options Sep 8 2008, 2:36 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.misc
From: Nemo <P...@nospam.nospam.nospam.nospam.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 21:36:25 +0100
Local: Mon, Sep 8 2008 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: Gyroscopic Inductance
...

>Gyroscopic Inductance circuit for DC current
>production using the gyroscope itself as the induction circuit for
>long term space flight. It will produce Direct current from a
>gyroscope

OK I am willing to believe this, what puzzles me is

>if gravitational
>interference occurs in space flight a dc pulsed circuit 90 degrees
>adjacent from the rotor flywheel controlled with small pulses of
>current to control initial spin and braking on the central rotor while
>motor functions are restored as needed,

(minor point) what is gravitational interference?

> This design has several viable
>applications for aro space industry. If solar panel deployment fails
>or damages to solar panels this is a solid backup for running the
>system operations of satellites and communication and instrumentation,
>imaging instrumentation devices for space flight.

Until it runs down. Producing current will drain rotational energy out
of the system. Or are you claiming it is some form of perpetual energy
generator?

Personally if I were designing a satellite I would be wary of putting
something spinning at high revs in my delicate assembly. If anything
went wrong and it broke free it could wreak havoc. I assume satellites
have gyros for navigational / orientation purposes, but with heavy
armour around them... (don't really know enough about this). Similarly
an aircraft won't want something equivalent to a small bomb inside it.
Imagine the safety certification issues. I do know that gyro storage of
energy is generally best for big pulses of power, it's not too efficient
for a high energy density torage device. That's what batteries or, if
cost is no object, fuel cells are for.
--
Nemo


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google