Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
From: PeterD <pet...@hipson.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:42:55 -0400
Local: Sat, Sep 6 2008 6:42 am
Subject: Re: Help Question: Electronic stethoscope danger
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:59:07 -0600, "WJW" <qua...@comcast.net> wrote: OK, that's a solution. But don't most of those systems also have a >Hello...a quick question looking for a good suggestion/solution/answer, >1) I have a small rural nursing school; battery option? >6) Was then informed it could possibly be a major shock hazard (110 power from Most hospitals have a staff who are trained to test and evaluate these >wall through speakers to stethoscope to person wearing (ear pieces) and to >patient's chest (diaphragm); types of devices. I assume these use a wall-wart, right? Does the wall-wart have a *real* UL label? (not a fake one!) >7) So...now I'm back to Step 1 & 2... Don't do this... Trust me, don't even go there. There are so many >Any suggestions on how I could truly prevent a surge danger for under $100 bucks better ways that will work well, that this is not practical in any way or shape. >Is there really even a danger in the first place? Possibly, especially if you are using stuff from teh likes of WallyWorld... >Thank you very much for your wisdom, advice and expertise! you should have no problems finding them. >William in Colorado You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||