sci.math Google Group

Re: JSH: Settled factoring research, what now?

rossu...@coldmail.com (rossum) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:36:12 UT

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:32:48 +0100, Han de Bruijn
No, it is an international Irish conspiracy - President Elect O'Bama -
need I say more?
rossum

Re: JSH: Settled factoring research, what now?

han.debru...@dto.tudelft.nl (Han de Bruijn) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:32:48 UT

Huh ? Rather thought it were terrorists going short at the stock market.
Han de Bruijn

Re: Absolute Continuity

han.debru...@dto.tudelft.nl (Han de Bruijn) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:30:09 UT

Seems that EVERY implementation is still not enough for some of us:
Who cares ? "All of them" do not really exist anyway.
Han de Bruijn

Re: JSH: Settled factoring research, what now?

tommy1...@hotmail.com (amy666) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:20:45 UT

well you could start proving RH
or disproving , since afterall your JSH ...
or maybe disproof FLT ' again '
and when you finished that , factoring agian.
or generalizations of RH or FLT.
or maybe you want to investigate the traveling saleman problem ' again '.
if all that is to easy for you , which it is of course , you might start with string theory, QM and turbulence physics.

Re: Absolute Continuity

dik.win...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:14:34 UT

...
> > Repeat 1000 times every morning before breakfast
> >
> > There is no such thing as two "subsequent" reals.
>
> But there is such in every floating point implementation of the reals.
Which does not implement reals but rationals and also not all of them.

Re: Simplify infinite series with Sines???

goo...@dedgud.com (TechnoBuddhist) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:15:39 UT

On Nov 18, 10:41 pm, Gerry Myerson <ge...@maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4ema il>
wrote:
gotcha! I'll do some analysis, thanks.

Re: Why "meta diagonals" are irrelevant

horand.gassm...@googlemail.com — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:12:02 UT

On Nov 19, 7:09 am, Brian Chandler <imaginator...@despammed.com>
wrote:
That is the crux of it. It is clear that there are /some/ natural
numbers, and it is pretty hard for even WM to deny the existence of
the sequence {1, 2, 3, ...}. It's his interpretation of the "..." that
is at issue, as well as the, ahem! inferences he draws from that.

Re: JSH: Settled factoring research, what now?

dik.win...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:07:24 UT

> Frederick Williams a écrit :
> >
> >> I do not claim to be able to factor an RSA number but if I could
> >> taunting me into doing it would be quite irresponsible, as if I did,
> >> forthwith the world economy would go from a slow crash to a fast one
> >> and all kinds of nasty things would happen.

Re: Absolute Continuity

han.debru...@dto.tudelft.nl (Han de Bruijn) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:09:06 UT

But there is such in every floating point implementation of the reals.
Han de Bruijn

Re: Absolute beginning

starswirlern...@maol.com (Painius) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:03:29 UT

They said the same thing to Heinz Pagels. He lost his life doing what
he was told not worth the risk.
Mitch Raemsch
****************************** **************************
Every day's a new day, every risk's a new risk.
If i were to be so afraid as to turn my nose down to
a 98% survival rate, i may as well stay in bed all day!

Re: Only example of acceleration approaching infinity

donstockba...@hotmail.com (Don Stockbauer) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:59:05 UT

Ok, we'll do it like snuffing out an oil well fire. Everybody all at
once never respond to his postings of drivel again. On your mark, get
set...
One wonders whether his posts will be filtered from the usenet
archives.

Theorem with out proof

azeez...@gmail.com (Nimo) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:53:07 UT

Falsification test: - before trying to prove this theorem,
try to disprove this, it can be easy for you to do that ,
To prove this theorem wrong, simple statement you have to agree
i.e. we can’t arrange 2 different things alternatively.
If you prove this theorem, all the credit is to you,
but share your work, So that everyone can know that.

Re: two qouestion

ann...@nym.alias.net.invalid (A N Niel) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:40:37 UT

In article
<28e8e6b9-bfcc-4d0d-86c2-93647 12c4...@c36g2000prc.googlegrou ps.com>,
That wasn't the question.

Re: Absolute Continuity

wpihug...@hotmail.com (William Hughes) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:39:01 UT

Repeat 1000 times every morning before breakfast
There is no such thing as two "subsequent" reals.
-William Hughes

Re: a^b^c ?

k...@unibwm.de (Herbert Kleebauer) — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:38:49 UT

rio wrote:
"a->b" is one of the 16 possible binary functions of two variables.
But first look at an other of the 16 functions, the "or" function.
a b | a or b
"a or b" is defined as ----|--------
0 0 | 0
0 1 | 1
1 0 | 1